Home  ›  Phones  ›  Motorola  ›

Motorola Moto X (GSM, 1st gen.)

 

Info Photos News Forum Reviews  5  

You must log in to post.

dark.angel

Jan 23, 2014, 3:56 PM

Moto X or Moto G

Wich one will be better Moto X or the Moto G.

The biggest problems is Cash I dont have a lot, so I know the Moto X is much Better that the G but I just Want to know wich one will you guys choose.

Im also think about a Atrix 4G
ralph.el41

Dec 17, 2013, 10:13 AM

Doesnt Support MHL

So I got a MHL adapter to HDMI, and turns out this phone doesnt have MHL, I searched several websites (like GSMarena) and the they say it does, but didnt see the forums, and when I just spent 500 MXN on something cant use, Im Kinda disapointed becuase I had I hopes to make my TV into SmartTV using My Moto X, any sugestions?
sounday

Nov 27, 2013, 5:14 PM
over in the "Motorola's Wood-Backed Moto X Due in Several Weeks" discussion:

Moto G

Wonder if by any chance the Moto G will have the same option, having a device such the Moto G with that customization available will be just awesome 🙂
andy2373

Nov 23, 2013, 10:53 AM
over in the "AT&T Moto X Now Receiving Android 4.4 KitKat" discussion:

Camera after update

Seems to of made my camera worse. Seems quicker, no longer shows what you were taking a picture of when you close running apps.
But picture quality in low light or lots of light colors seem to be worse.
deanwoof

Nov 11, 2013, 4:52 PM
over in the "Moto Maker Now Available to Sprint, T-Mobile, Verizon" discussion:

How does warranty and insurance work?

1 year obviously through Motorola I would assume. I'm sure GSM customers have a better experience going through Moto but what about CDMA like Sprint and Verizon?

The same with insurance.

How is a replacement device ordered? Is it a black/white stock one at that point or a completely remade device with the original color combination??
1 reply
bluecoyote

Nov 1, 2013, 7:17 PM
over in the "Motorola Commits to Updating Moto X, Droids to KitKat" discussion:

Motorola

is a running joke.
2 replies
mickrussom

Nov 4, 2013, 10:40 AM
over in the "Motorola Commits to Updating Moto X, Droids to KitKat" discussion:

Motorola - Idiots.

With google owning them they should have taken over by now. They have the best radios / reception / build quality in general, but they are mentally ill about updating their expensive phones.

But instead of flooding the google play store with unlocked stock devices with no crapware at a great price, they continue to suck-off losers like Veriscum, losers that lock phones and losers that charge confiscatory rates for international roaming. Losers.

And this rubbish with lines of phones that are Vz exclusive, how lame.

Yawn at motorola, get off the bench and start winning again with google behind you and UPDATE YOUR PHONES to 4.4 and STOP BEING A WHIMP.
1 reply
tschlicht

Oct 31, 2013, 2:58 PM
over in the "Google Makes Moto X Camera App Available in Play Store " discussion:

Gool idea

Well that's a cool way to hand out updates. Instead of waiting for stupid carriers.
bobc74

Oct 17, 2013, 1:01 PM
edited
over in the "Moto Maker Will Import iPhone Contact Data to Moto X" discussion:

While this may

seem like a great idea from a sales perspective it's also yet another way companies can access your information. The whole point of creating an anonymous user ID and secure password is to prevent anyone from accessing your information. Would you be as trusting if Motorola was asking for your debit card PIN? Probably not. So why trust them with access to an account that might be linked to that same debit card for iTunes and App Store purchases? Also don't forget, Motorola is owned by Google. And we all know some of the things Google does with personal information.
2 replies
andy2373

Oct 7, 2013, 3:17 PM
over in the "AT&T Pushing Software Update to Moto X" discussion:

Hmmm....

I think it made my Moto X's camera worse, especially in low light. 🤨
ego2k

Sep 10, 2013, 4:45 PM
edited
over in the "Motorola Selling Moto X to T-Mobile Customers Directly" discussion:

Slow rollout, poor availability, and improper pricepoint was its downfall

Poor execution of distribution, perceived pricepoint, and communication was it's downfall.
ego2k

Sep 10, 2013, 4:43 PM
over in the "Motorola Selling Moto X to T-Mobile Customers Directly" discussion:

Does it even matter at that price point iPhine now has $99 5c

$600 direct from Motorola vs. new iPhone 5c. Motorola Google fumbled this rollout. It was the best for about 2 weeks. And only for AT&T customers. Now it's passe. Everyone say hello and goodbye to Moto X. It was fun while it lasted. Rollout=Epic failure. Even the media couldn't save it.
Hays21

Aug 25, 2013, 11:40 AM
over in the "Motorola Says Custom Moto X Orders May Not Arrive in 4 Days" discussion:

Moto Maker

I don't see the wood options in moto maker that motorola said was going to be a possibility ☚ī¸
6 replies
ceric20

Aug 26, 2013, 6:50 PM
over in the "Motorola Says Custom Moto X Orders May Not Arrive in 4 Days" discussion:

2 weeks till delivery...

🤭 So I went down Friday morning and ordered one of these phones... got the email friday saying they are working on it.... All i wanted was a 32 GB white phone... and i had to order it... Not happy.. I am going to return the device as soon as it gets here... When i buy a phone i want to walk in the store and buy it not order it and have to wait 2 weeks... This sucks!
6 replies
Rusty Shackleford

Aug 28, 2013, 12:56 AM
over in the "Motorola Says Custom Moto X Orders May Not Arrive in 4 Days" discussion:

Utter incompetence

It shows utter incompetence for the manufacturer to get to the last minute only to realize (and announce to the customers) that it cannot make good on a promise like this. If the people at Motorola are really so clueless that it took until now for them to realize they couldn't handle this customization then they deserve to fail.
michael_herc

Aug 23, 2013, 4:33 PM
over in the "Motorola Says Custom Moto X Orders May Not Arrive in 4 Days" discussion:

Verizon

It stinks that Verizon isn't getting the customization option at this point. That may hurt sales for Motorola as non-AT&T customers may forgo purchasing the device and purchase a competing one instead.
10 replies
bluecoyote

Aug 2, 2013, 12:59 AM
over in the "Hands-On: MOTO X" discussion:

I'm totally confused

I don't understand this. If I don't care about specs, I own an iPhone. If I care about personalization, I buy a case for it, which allows me to swap out the appearance of my phone far more often than my contract. And because it's a case, my penchant for bizarre colors won't effect my resale value.

(And although many cases are lame, there are some pretty damn cool ones out there for the iPhone.)

Or, to sum it up with more direct competition, the Galaxy lets you peel off the back cover and put on a new one at will.
2 replies
apocalyptustree

Aug 20, 2013, 5:47 PM
over in the "Motorola Will Not Engrave Moto X at Launch" discussion:

MS was able to do it with ZuneHD

Not that Zune is the best business plan to emulate
middlekid3058

Aug 19, 2013, 6:14 PM
over in the "Motorola Will Not Engrave Moto X at Launch" discussion:

THATS IT THE LAST STRAW

I am not ordering it...lets see how they do without my $$...(heavy sarcasm...)
4 replies
Haggard

Aug 20, 2013, 9:20 AM
over in the "Motorola Will Not Engrave Moto X at Launch" discussion:

Engraving

Easiest way to devalue your phone immediately before it's even opened.
1 reply
 
 
Page  1  of 1

Subscribe to Phone Scoop News with RSS Follow @phonescoop on Threads Follow @phonescoop on Mastodon Phone Scoop on Facebook Follow on Instagram

 

Playwire

All content Copyright 2001-2024 Phone Factor, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Content on this site may not be copied or republished without formal permission.